本平台为互联网非涉密平台,严禁处理、传输国家秘密、工作秘密或敏感信息

Comparison of Two Methods for Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Measurement
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The level of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in the blood is a standard measure of the long-term glycemic status of the human body. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is the standard reference method for HbA1c measurement as designated by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC). Gel-capillary isoelectric focusing (cIEF) with a stable pH gradient of 20 mmol/L NaOH (catholyte solution) and 20 mmol/L sulfuric acid (anolyte solution) and gels containing ampholytes have outstanding separation power. In this study, HPLC has been compared to gel-cIEF for the measurement of HbA1c. HPLC and gel-cIEF were used to measure the HbA1c values of 46 randomly selected blood samples. Correlation analysis revealed that the two methods showed a good correlation. The HPLC method was prone to interference by hemoglobin variants and exhibited low specificity. The gel-cIEF method was not affected by hemoglobin variants and showed high specificity. In conclusion, gel-cIEF can be used as an alternative method to HPLC for the standard detection of glycated hemoglobin.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation
Related Videos

Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:April 25,2015
  • Revised:
  • Adopted:
  • Online: January 28,2016
  • Published:
Article QR Code