两种消解方法在火焰原子吸收光谱法测定马氏珠母贝中微量镉的比较
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

作者简介:吴育廉(1977-),男,实验师,主要从事化学实验教学和实验室管理工作 通讯作者:杨捷

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

广东省科技厅项目(2010B020313005)


Comparison of Two Digestion Methods for Determination of Cadmium in Pinctada martensii by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    比较两种样品消解方法即高压密封消解法和常规湿法消解法,用火焰原子吸收光谱法测定马氏珠母贝中微量镉的含量。结果表明:测定采用高压消解罐法消解的马氏珠母贝中镉含量为60.96 mg/kg,湿法消解法的为61.65 mg/kg,测定结果没有明显差异,测定RSD均小于3%,回收率结果分别为97.44~101.29%和96.77~102.19%。两种消解方法相对设备要求简单,花费少,均能满足分析测定要求,符合绝大部分实验室条件,相比之下高压密封消解操作更简单,方便,消耗酸量更少。

    Abstract:

    Two kinds of sample digestion methods, high pressure airproof digestion and conventional wet digestion, were tested for determination of cadmium content in Pinctada martensii by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. The results showed that the cadmium contents in Pinctada martensii by high pressure digestion digestion and wet digestion were 60.96 mg/kg and 61.65 mg/kg, respectively. The RSD were less than 3% and the recovery by the two methods were 97.44~101.29% and 96.77~102.19%, respectively. Both of the two methods required relatively simple equipments and low cost. Digestion with high pressure airproof was more facile, convenient and needed less consumption of acid than wet digestion.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吴育廉,杨捷,廖艳,吴晓萍.两种消解方法在火焰原子吸收光谱法测定马氏珠母贝中微量镉的比较[J].现代食品科技,2013,29(6):1406-1408.

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2013-01-31
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2013-10-29
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
×
因办公室装修,期间暂时无法接听电话,如有事请QQ或邮件联系。信息咨询:QQ: 2553003667稿件处理1:QQ: 1542354573稿件处理2:QQ: 2195608851 财务咨询:QQ: 1347040116 Email:mfood@scut.edu.cn、mfood@foxmail.com